St. Maximos' Hut

Price Gouging II
Andy's comments on "price gouging" seem very reasonable to me.

If I understand correctly, price gouging occurs when a gas station gets its tank filled up at $2.00 per gallon on Monday and instead of charging its customers $2.20, which will cover its operating costs, it charges $3.00 on Tuesday because the wholesale price of gasoline has jumped by $0.80 from one day to the next. Suppose it continued to charge $2.20. In this case, customers would soon be lining up to get its gas, which sells for 80 cents less than its competitors' -- quickly emptying its tank. The big winners would be the lucky/savvy drivers who discovered the good deal. This sounds generous, but is it generosity to the right people? Do lucky/savvy people deserve generosity?

I find the public's fascination with gasoline pricing odd. This is one of the most competitive industries imaginable. Buyers have very good knowledge about prices -- which are posted prominently -- and there are several competitors within a stone's throw of each other on most commercial strips. Usually, the price per gallon differs by a few cents from station to station. (Although in the last week or so, I've noticed the variance in prices widening considerably, with differences reaching 10 or 15 cents a gallon.) Having a big, thirsty family, I often spend as much per week on milk as I do on gas. The price of milk varies from store to store by as much as a dollar per gallon. Time for an investigation?
Posted by Robert Whaples on Tuesday September 6, 2005 at 9:01am
Andy Morriss (mail):
If there is any additional federal intervention into the milk market (beyond the amazing amount that already exists), I will hold Robert personally accountable!
9.6.2005 9:52am
Brian (www):
You really, really don't want to look into the milk market. I don't remember where I've read this description (Google is no help), but the dairy market is regulated by a set of price controls that would make a Soviet central planner blush.
9.6.2005 3:06pm
Andy Morriss (mail):
Right, I read where there are supposed to be only 2 people in the world who understand US milk pricing.
9.6.2005 3:38pm
Roger Meiners (mail):
The kind of price gouging referred to during hurricanes, etc. is charging a high price for a bag of ice that normally goes for $1. Suppose there is one bag left in the uproar before the storm. I offer $20 for it so I can have nice clear cubes for my gin and tonics during the storm party I am hosting. An old lady wants the bag so she can keep the medicine cold for her ailing husband. She only has $1.38 to offer. She and her husband have no transportation out and will ride out the storm too. Well, say the efficiency-minded economists--better that the ice go for the gin and tonics because that must be the highest valued use. It creates incentives for entrepreneurs to get more ice there in a hurry after the storm. True enough, but it trivializes the importance of markets to declare that all price controls are uneconomical, and, I gather, immoral. Such selling behavior is, in a positive analysis world, economically acceptable. But almost everyone would agree that it is immoral. It is the kind of behavior that generates wide opposition to freely functioning markets. Better a little restraint in dire situations than give added justification to market haters to condemn free markets in general by using extreme examples of gouging. The current high price of gasoline is not gouging, it is related to general market conditions, not one store playing the role of finding the high point on the demand curve in the market to unload the last few units.
9.6.2005 7:01pm
Fr. Charles Nalls (mail):
John Stossel has offered an interesting perspective in his article In Praise of Price Gouging which can be found in today's TownHall.com Digest
I have to say that he grossly understates the role of charity, which he describes as "benevolence", in the market.
9.7.2005 6:33am
anon literate:
That's a straw man. Anti-gouging laws don't prohibit selling at a profit. They prohibit selling at a price greater than you can justify. If the price of gas jumps 80 cents, then you can clearly justify an 80 cent increase in your prices. Nobody's say $3 gas ought to be illegal. But in some areas, gas has gone up to $6.

It's also not a problem where there's a competitive market, but in small towns, there may be only one gas station, or all of the gas stations may be owned by one person.
9.7.2005 10:43pm