As we’ve discussed on this blog, the free market has many virtues when it comes to allocating scarce resources. With a few notable exceptions (e.g. externalities), it’s quite effective at bringing us to the point where the marginal cost of additional output equates the marginal benefit. But I’ve got this gnawing feeling that the free market has failed on a grander scale. In countries like the U.S., the free market machine has solved the problem of material poverty, but in its place we’ve got a problem just as big – not knowing what to do with our material abundance. Consumer sovereignty is the essence of the free market. If people want it and it can be made, producers will make it. The big problem is what people want. We (me included) want things that are so pathetically trivial. We spend our time chasing ephemeral desires.
Am I right in damning the free market for these failures? Is it culpable of abetting our culture in leading us farther and farther away from what’s really important?
(And no, I am not agitating for a return either to the Sublime Porte or to the Nomenklatura. Please don't read into this more than is meant.)
Isaac